YEOMANS CONCEPTS.com

This Is How We End Climate Change

Who Is Allan Yeomans?

formatfactoryimg_0838Allan is the originator of the concept of soil carbon sequestration. His concept was first described in his 1989 paper "The Agricultural Solution To The Greenhouse Effect".

1

Link To Video/Photo Gallery

Allan-Yeomans-with-the-Yeomans-Carbon-Still-prototype  

2

LINK TO YEOMANS PLOW WEB SITE

For you, on the farm, on the property, on the ranch there is one thing that you can do much better than nature can. And you can do it in an instant. How? By gentle subsoil cultivation you can create the ideal soil environment for soil life to produce stable humus. And the all the carbon in that humus comes from atmospheric carbon dioxide.

3

Born After 1985 “The world is your oyster” “not bloody likely?”

2

Stopping Global Warming Tactics

Here we will summarise the actions you can do to make things happen. And why they are important. Each of us will have some unique ability to help twig the way we work and live, so that climate change stops. That’s the start of stabilizing and normalising our Earth’s weather and oceanic systems.  

5

Funding to stop Climate Change

Ending global warming and terminating climate change can be, near enough to a cost-free exercise.. We stop subsidizing the “bad guys” – fossil fuels and agrochemicals and start subsidizing the “good guys” – that’s organic type farming and biofuels. The money us, the world tax payers, fork out in subsidizing the sales of fossil fuels and agrochemicals is insane.  It just  guarantees that climates will get progressively worse for centuries, and we're paying for it .  

6

Carbon Still – Testing for Humus

YEOMANS CARBON STILL          using Loss On Ignition (LOI)  *Big 2,000 grams sample size *Dries sample in 30 minutes to 100°C *LOI Temperatures - 350°C to 550°C *Complete LOI in 60 to 90 minutes *Integral weighing in-situ at 100°C  *Accuracy  1/1000  *No laboratory needed. Farm shed OK With accurate infield sampling kit. Powered 4 inch auger. Powered mixer, Sampling sieves. 

7

Yeomans Methodology

The Yeomans Methodology is designed to encourage farmers to "have a go" at removing the carbon dioxide overload while keeping the people, or governments or organizations issuing the carbon credits totally confident that the CO2 is being removed as claimed by the farmer claims.  Any other requirements in a protocol inevitably becomes a restriction on invention and discovery.

8

Energy Systems and Nuclear

It’s easy, practical and economical to switch to biofuels for transport and it’s easy, practical and economical to switch to nuclear energy for industrial power. We must remind ourselves that so called “sustainable” energy or “renewable” energy are only sustainable and renewable because they’re nuclear based.  

9

How bad can it Get?

10

Fossil Fuels & Agrochemicals use fake News

Fossil fuels and agrochemicals are the prime causes of Global Warming. It’s logical to appreciate that Global warming cannot end if those organisations continue to exist. Those organisations know that. So, they use fake news, political lobbying and perception management to confuse the issue.

11

Volunteers – How you can make a difference and be involved.

 

12

Home Page – This is how we end Global Warming. Navigating around this site.

 First: You put the Cursor on one of the 13 numbered buttons. Second: The button turns yellow and the big square on the left side lights up with a summary of what you will find when you open the page. Third: Leave the Cursor arrow there and Left Click and you have opened the whole page. The lower part of the screen then comes up with all the information. Forth:Then scroll up or down to find what you want. Fifth: Click the WHITE HOUSE if you want to go back up to the top of the page.

13
3. LINK TO YEOMANS PLOW WEB SITE 4. Born After 1985 “The world is your oyster” “not bloody likely?” 5. Stopping Global Warming Tactics 6. Funding to stop Climate Change 7. Carbon Still – Testing for Humus 8. Yeomans Methodology 9. Energy Systems and Nuclear
2. Link To Video/Photo Gallery 1. Who Is Allan Yeomans? 13. Home Page – This is how we end Global Warming. Navigating around this site.

"The urgent problem is getting rid of the excess carbon dioxide that's already there. Soil can do that.

Emissions reductions must become zero, but that can be phased in over the next two to three decades."
Allan Yeomans. January 1998

Yeomans LOI Soil "Carbon Still"© test takes two hours. Accepts huge 2,000 gram test sample. 550°C

Plus - Yeomans Soil Test Protocol
(for info click Button 1)

10. How bad can it Get? 11. Fossil Fuels & Agrochemicals use fake News 12. Volunteers – How you can make a difference and be involved.

     CARBON STILL for LOI Testing and Integral Weighing. Australia, China and the United States are the only nations with huge agricultural land areas. If we want to stop global warming, we can’t without those countries using their agricultural soils to help clean the atmosphere of the CO2 excess. The Yeomans Carbon Still and sample collection system, or something very much like it, is an absolute necessity if soil carbon sequestration is to happen sufficiently to halt Global Warming.

The Yeomans Carbon Still and soil sampling system,  I believe is the only soil carbon test unit in the world that allows soil carbon sequestration to be very easily and accurately monitored by virtually anyone, and with soil sample sizes that are meaningful and not minuscule. It tests samples weighing up to 2 kilograms (over 4 lbs). It gives quick and accurate and consistent results. The Carbon Still is easy to use, easy to set up in a farm shed and requires only a power supply and access to a basic service station sized air compressor.

It was designed specifically to make soil carbon sequestration sufficiently measurable to satisfy large financially institutions. 

There are several systems that are used to determine changes in soil carbon, unfortunately, most involve some form of specialised chemical analysis and additionally, in all these procedures, the actual samples are extremely small. They’re under and 5 grams but most only cater for samples weighing one gram maximum.  These systems were originally designed for detailed soil chemical analysis under laboratory conditions. For minerals not humus. None were for soil carbon sequestration. When they were designed (some in the 1930s) the carbon content, and specifically the organic matter content were generally only of very minor interest.

It is hard to believe and accept that such tiny samples could give accurate representations of the carbon content of, possibly a 100 ha or 1,000 ha paddock, or even a 10 ha paddock. A few grams is ludicrously small: it’s just not enough for financial institutions to trust. In Australia the Department of the Environment seems to have abandoned the concept of actually testing for changes in levels of organic carbon sequester. (Except for one methodology of the Department’s own design, relating to grazing lands, which seems to have received no significant or meaningful support from Australia’s 157,000 farmers.)The Department have decided to allocate credits to a farmer if he alters his management systems on any area of land in some way stipulated by officers of the Department.

******************************************

       What do we really need to know? 

We must not forget that the only objective being considered must be the removal of carbon dioxide from the air to combat Global Warming. Nothing else matches this importance. So, what we really need to know, and all we need to know is; “has the farmer been successful in removing carbon dioxide from the air by increasing the carbon content of his or her soil.”This increase can only come as an increase in organic carbon.

Our job is to weigh it and pay the farmer for the effort.

In the Yeomans Carbon Still a sample being tested is often around two thousand times the size used in all other systems. And apart from screening soil samples to pass through the universally accepted 2 mm screen aperture.

There is no other sample preparation required.

***************************************
Reality demands that soils can be tested easily, cheaply and accurately. Reality demands that field samples be taken. Reality demands that samples are taken that are of a sensible and practical size and in turn are easy to weigh with high accuracy. We therefore built a unit and a system to test individual samples with sample sizes around two kilograms – not two grams and definitely easy to weigh. Weighing accuracy of the Carbon Still comes out at around 1.5 grams in a 2,000 gram sample. That’s 0.075%. So we allow 0.1%.

Most soil carbon testing protocols use chemical analysis techniques which unfortunately give differing results for different soil types. All also only handle tiny samples. To ask financial bodies to put their trust and money in such testing systems is absolutely ludicrous. Coming into increasing favour now, in soil carbon analysis, is the Loss On Ignition (LOI) procedure. Sample sizes are, by necessity for the equipment used,  tiny: 10 grams being the biggest ever used. In a LOI test the prepared sample is oven dried with oven temperatures slightly in excess of 100°C The sample is then placed in a desecrater to keep it dry. Then quickly weighed. The sample is then placed in an oven with temperature set at a predicated temperature to oxidise the organic carbon compounds.  The surrounding air in the oven oxidises the organic carbon into carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. Predicated temperatures vary, usually generally irrationally and range between 350° C and 550° C.

From research information and experience we maintain that temperatures approaching 350° C are too inconsistent and with forced heated air flow, temperatures around 400° C or the best.

The recent EU Standards  nominate 525° C  to 575° C. in muffle furnace type ovens which are relying on ambient air to oxidize. (See Note 2  among others, this Note refers to EU standard TC WI :2003 (E)  for Loss On Ignition testing for sludge, soil and bio-waste is 550°C + or – 25°C.) In existing systems a considerable amount of time is required to bring the soil samples up to the nominated temperature range in the test. This is unavoidable as the oven temperature range has to be relatively narrow for consistency. Maximum oven temperatures must not exceed the higher temperature nominated in the relevant protocol so the soaking of heat into the centre of even a small sample is time consuming. These soaking times are always hours and can often be days.

Testing for Soil Organic Carbon with the Yeomans Carbon Still and its Allied Equipment

In the Yeomans Carbon Still, air at the relevant nominated temperature is forced through the test sample. Heating is therefore almost immediate and temperatures are consistent and controllable. In the Carbon Still sample sizes are around 1.5 to  kilograms, drying times are around 30 minutes and the Loss On Ignition procedure is generally less than 90 minutes. This short time is more than sufficient because of the unique forced air process.

There is a 100 mm (4inch) diameter vertical tubular inner oven within the Carbon Still. The sample is constrained and held in place to effectively block air flow around the sample. Air at the nominated temperature is therefore forced down through the sample. For drying, air temperatures are set a little over 100°C. When air temperatures exiting the lower oven rise to exceed 100°C, drying can be confidently deemed complete,. For assurance, once the exit air temperature first exceeds 100°C it should be held there for 15 minutes after which the sample and its inner oven container can be weighed.

Throughout the drying and high temperature cooking process, the test sample remains in its tubular inner oven container. This container, with the sample, is weighed as a single unit. After determining a dry weight reading, high temperature air is then forced through the test sample to produce ignition. Air flow rates and air input temperatures are manually adjusted to control ignition rates and temperatures.

With the surface area principle we propose, stones and rocks in the samples can simply be discarded. They need only be brushed a little, to remove any attached fine soil material.

However: when a soil density based calculation system is used it’s obviously necessary that stones and rocks cannot be discarded. Stones and rocks are a meaningful factor in accurately determining average, soil density. Therefore all stones and rocks in the samples must stay in the samples, and must in turn be ground up sufficiently to pass through a 2 mm screen.

This is not necessary when using the surface area principle. (If a density system is a set requirement of the relevant Authority then this can be accommodated with the this same equipment. The SOIL PIPE and the auger are simply taken to a known and preselected depth. The sample is dried and weighed and knowing the volume of the used section of the sleeve, the dry density is then easily calculated.)

In the Carbon Still the central tubular oven containing the test sample is mounted in a “see saw” arrangement. Weighings are determined by balancing the “see saw”. The see saw is initially balanced, approximately, with a couple of heavy weights. Final and accurate balancing is achieved by simply adding water to a beaker or laboratory measuring cylinder placed adjacent to the weights in the balance tray. A pipette is ideal for this weight adjusting procedure. After the drying process, and again after the cooking process, some number of  millilitres of water are removed from the beaker to balance, and every millilitre is one gram.

It’s simple, easy and very accurate. After the cooking process the sample is cooled using forced cool air so that exhaust air temperatures always slightly exceed 100°C. Condensation cannot occur. So desiccators are not required at all in this system. The cubic centimetres of water removed after drying, and the water removed after cooking tells us the original water content of the sample and the weight LOI in grams. Some soils are formed from geological material that when heated to the temperatures called for in LOI soil testing release small quantities of water of crystallization (magmatic water). Some release carbon dioxide. This obviously effects the LOI weight loss determinations. However we are not interested in absolute figures, we only want to know what changes have occurred over the previous year. Organic matter content will change but the geological nature of the soil will not. Hence the LOI attributed to the geological base of the soil is irrelevant in soil carbon sequestration calculations. It is also suggested that as the organic matter increases in the soil in a test hole the proportion of geological material must conversely decrease. In monitory calculations this is a slight detriment to the farmer. In consequence, it just cannot in anyway lead to some possible overpayment to a farmer for his success in his efforts to terminate Global Warming and catastrophic Climate Change.

SOIL PIPE & SCREW AUGER  for Infield Soil Sample Collection Soil collection procedures and organic matter calculations can be based on the surface area of the sample and the paddock, or it can be a density related calculation. When density related, organic matter is determined and recorded as a weight percentage or in grams per kilogram. Often samples are called for at various stratifications in the soil profile. The reality is that combating Global Warming is the whole point of soil carbon sequestration and measurement. Soil samples have to be taken. And those samples have to be measured cheaply, efficiently and with definitive and financially acceptable accuracy.

We have to remove from our atmosphere that trillion tonnes of excess carbon dioxide that we have dumped there over the last 75 years. No esoteric academic niceties nor luxuries can be permitted to interfere with that essential and absolute requirement.

Another pedantic and wasteful procedure is for authorities to demand to know, and therefore have determined at what the depth, in the soil profile, the new organic carbon is formed, and whether there is more or less at some specific depth, and whether it might vary over time. It’s a wasteful and extravagant and pointless exercise. It’s another delaying tactic for those industries and countries who have a callous need for global warming to continue unabated.

The surface area concept is considerably cheaper, more logical and delightfully practical. If we have sufficient test sites, and we know the surface area of those sites and the depth the farmer expects to fertility enhance their soil, we have all we need to know. And we can pay them.  And we all win.

A reliable and workable reward based system for soil sequestration demands easy, reliable and accurate sample collection and collation. This obvious and necessary requirement demanded that practical and suitable equipment had to be designed and developed to suit all locations and all soil types. So we developed the SOIL PIPE concept where, in principle, an auger is screwed into the ground as is common but, in our SOIL PIPE system the auger is enclosed in a metal tube with a known specific outside diameter. In operations, as the auger penetrates the soil the surrounding tube follows the auger bit down. The top of the tube is reinforced and may be hammered down to follow the bit. In practise however, the tube almost falls down the hole and simply follows the bit down. A very precisely sized sample is always obtained, quickly and easily.

Nothing else with reliable accuracy seems to exist and be used anywhere in the world. Unenclosed post hole diggers, tree planting augers and general garden tools, all of unspecified, arbitrary and widely varying designs are invariable recommended. Reproducible and trustworthy results were therefore impossible. With our SOIL PIPE  no soil is able to fall into the hole from the sides. This usually happens with no pipe surround because of the softness or dryness of the soil being drilled. With the SOIL PIPE, even in hard soil, loose soil, or even sand, the sample size and bulk, being strategically confined by the SOIL PIPE remains precise and consistent.

Our SOIL PIPE has an outer diameter of 115 mm (standard light wall 4 inch pipe). In operation the Sleeve penetrates down to half a metre into the soil; or less if desired. The Sleeve lengths can, for special operations,  be made longer. There are two systems for collecting the soil from the auger. In one the SOIL PIPE fits through a hold in a one and a half metre square Collection Blanket laid on the ground. All the soil from the hole, and only the soil from the hole is ultimately collected on the Blanket. Consistency is assured. This soil is then collected together on the blanket and poured into a suitable container for transport.

In the second system a 10 kg soil sample can be collected and dumped in a bucket on the vehicle usually in way under 5 minutes. It’s a fast operation. In this second  sample collection system, a fabric collection cone hangs under the auger and collects the soil as the auger digs. It looks like an inverted parachute. So we call it “The Parachute System”.

There is therefore no necessity to clear the surrounding area of grass or loose vegetation as when using the ground blanket system. The auger, the sampling pipe and the collection cone is a one piece item. It incorporates the auger, the collection pipe and a fabric collection cone.

The unit is best mounted on a small flat trayed utility vehicle equipped with a small electric winch. The auger system is never removed from the winch. The winch control, itself mounted on the assembly, allows the auger to be lowered into the ground and when full of soil can be hoisted onto the vehicle or over a bucket for emptying.  If the auger is tight in the ground it can be easily removed using the lifting winch.        

There is a small 4 inch diameter 2 stroke power auger supplied with these soil collecting systems.  The spinning auger consistently breakes up the any hard soil ready for screening and lifts the soil to the top of the SOIL PIPE where it is discharged.  With the ground blanket system aA fabric material Mini Skirt, confines the discharge so the soil is all collected on the blanket and can then be swept up and shovelled into a suitable container.

With the Parachute Collector the complete field rig is lifted with its crain and swung over a collecting bucket.

With the Parachute Collector It generally takes less than a minute to obtain a complete, half metre depth, sample. The outer diameter of the SOIL PIPE equates to a calculated ground area. This area consequently bears a known mathematic relation to the paddock area. In turn the organic carbon content of the blended and screened, heated and tested sample mathematically determines the organic carbon content of the paddock, down to the nominated sampling depth.

It should be appreciated that as the fertility increases due to changed farm  practises, soil density will slightly decrease. In monitory calculations, (just as was considered with water of crystallization) this is a slight detriment to the farmer. In consequence, it just cannot in anyway lead to some possible overpayment to a farmer for his success in his efforts to terminate Global Warming and catastrophic Climate Change.   

 

BUNK BED SIEVES    for Sample Cleaning, Screening and Preparation   .   The field samples from the particular paddock can generally be placed directly into the Bunk Bed Sieves having already been broken up into small pieces by the auger.

Sometimes, if the soil is wet or damp it can clump together into balls. If this happens the combined field samples are best spread on a clean floor and allowed to air dry for a few hours and then remixed. They are best air dried to the point where the material can be obviously and comfortably worked through the Bunk Bed Sieves supplied with the Carbon Still Kit.

Direct sunlight should be avoided in the drying process. The material should then be thoroughly mixed to form a homogeneous composite. The composite is then worked through the Bunk Bed Sieves.

The set of sieves nest together and when the soil has been worked through any sieve, leaving only the stones and rocks, the sieve is tilted up and the rocks discharge onto the ground or into a bucket. See photo.

That sieve is then lifted off and the soil is worked through the next finer sieve down. The final sieve has a 2 mm aperture and below that is a tray where the sample material is ultimately collected.   Sliding heavy block, (a still block with scraper is supplied with the unit) or a house brick, back and forth over the material gives quick and efficient screening.

 

There are three sieves mounted on each other with a collecting tray under.   The top one has approximately 10 mm openings.  The next approximately 5 mm openings. The lower sieve is a standard 2 mm opening sieve. Generally using either a Loss On Ignition procedure or a procedure based on chemical analysis, the biggest of the particles in the material being tested is required to pass through a 2 mm aperture metal screen. I believe this is a sane and sensible requirement and it is in generally use in most laboratories worldwide.

There are three sieves plus the collector tray in the system. The support frame for the sieves also serves as a packaging frame. The photo shows the three sieves nestled inside an inverted support frame and held with a bungy cord. Thus transporting the system is easy.

The “pack” can stand up, or lay down on any side, or in any way required.   The above shows two sieves and a Collecting Tray under them. Also the red part is a steel rubbing tool, to do the same job as a small house brick mentioned earlier. After the material has been worked through the top sieve this sieve is then tilted up to discharge any stones and rocks. (In other systems the rocks can’t be discarded,

Where soil density is involved in calculations, all stones and rocks have to be retained and ground down to fit through the final 2 mm sieve.

When one sieve has been used it is tipped up to discharge any stones of sticks or other similar materials.  This upper sieve is then removed to gain access to the next sieve down. Any fibrous material such as plant roots and plant leaves must be hand selected and discarded in the screening process. Dead or  decaying organic carbon material and soil humus from all the field samples is ultimately located in the lower collection tray.

This final well mixed material must be split, possible several times, until a sample weighing around 2 kilograms is obtained. The numerical subdividing of the combined bulk sample can be done by mechanical separation, by “splitting”,  or simply by weight, until a suitable sample size suitable to “cook” in the Carbon Still is obtained.

Finally the Collecting Tray itself is emptied into a suitable container for mixing and splitting for testing in the Carbon Still. The final sample is then loaded into the Carbon Still for drying, and also to obtain a dry weight balance.

After a dry weight balance has been determined, the supply air is then brought up to the nominated LOI temperature until system exhaust temperatures stabilize. The system is held there for a “soak” period. Use 30 minutes after temperature stabilization is well established.

The soak period is to ensure that complete organic matter combustion is complete

Samples with high organic matter content require the monitoring of both input air volumes and temperatures. These are easily controllable in the Yeomans Carbon Still. This control is often necessary to prevent excess temperature rises resulting from the sometimes high heat release from the combustion of the sample’s own organic matter content.

###################################*wwwwwwwwwwww

wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww******************************

Saturday 16  11  19 3 pm

           The Yeomans Carbon Still. My hand is on the air flow meter. The balance arm is to my right. A dry balance is obtained by adding or removing water from a  beaker after the exhaust air has stabilized at the nominated, above 100 °C temperature.  The input air is then bought up to the nominated LOI temperature, (around 500°C). When temperatures totally stabilize they are held there for a nominated time, generally around 20 minutes. When this  “heat soak” is over, cool air is forced through the sample to reduce exhaust temperatures to slightly over 100°C. The decrease in weight from LOI is then obtained by reducing the water content of the balancing beaker. The reduction in millilitres is then the LOI in grams from the soil sample. In this protocol the known  “surface area” of the sample bears a known arithmetical relationship to the area of the test paddock. Changes in following years can only realistically be attributed to changes in organic matter content. The geological basics of the soil won’t change. The quantity of carbon dioxide sequestered into soil humus on that paddock, up from the previous original base line determinations is a simple calculation.     The farmer must then be payed the carbon dioxide equivalent of that increase in soil carbon.      Then finally when the trillion tonnes excess carbon dioxide is gone from our atmosphere, so too will be the creeping cancer of climate change.     ************************************ (Note added 14 September)     The CFI Initiative Act 2011 I understand to be the first legislation in the world where a Government agrees to pay its farmers for soil carbon sequestration. I produced my first paper on my concept on 1989 so it has taken 22 years for it to become law anywhere in the world. Here it is administrated by the Department of Environment and Energy. They naturally require suitable protocols on how a system should function. Unfortunately the actual sequestration of carbon into agricultural soils has become a very poor second to the Departments creation of detailed and restrictive protocol creation and their insistence on a farmer’s utter compliance. I compiled the following Yeomans protocol in late 2016 early 2017. In March 2017 the Department made it obvious it would not be passed and anyway, it was not in their appropriate and approved format.  So I did another one. This time I followed the format  of their own hugely detailed (but totally unaccepted by the Australian Farmers) methodologies.  This “Yeomans Protocol ” I finally completed in late April 2017. The Department, and some people in their working groups that I was able to find, were immediately sent copies. The Department didn’t like it and won’t approve it.  But for Australia and the World’s major agricultural countries it’s essential it is approved. So I’m not giving up.