This Is How We End Climate Change

Who Is Allan Yeomans?

formatfactoryimg_0838Allan is the originator of the concept of soil carbon sequestration. His concept was first described in his 1989 paper "The Agricultural Solution To The Greenhouse Effect".


Link To Video/Photo Gallery




For you, on the farm, on the property, on the ranch there is one thing that you can do much better than nature can. And you can do it in an instant. How? By gentle subsoil cultivation you can create the ideal soil environment for soil life to produce stable humus. And the all the carbon in that humus comes from atmospheric carbon dioxide.


Born After 1985 “The world is your oyster” “not bloody likely?”


Stopping Global Warming Tactics

Here we will summarise the actions you can do to make things happen. And why they are important. Each of us will have some unique ability to help twig the way we work and live, so that climate change stops. That’s the start of stabilizing and normalising our Earth’s weather and oceanic systems.  


Funding to stop Climate Change

Ending global warming and terminating climate change can be, near enough to a cost-free exercise.. We stop subsidizing the “bad guys” – fossil fuels and agrochemicals and start subsidizing the “good guys” – that’s organic type farming and biofuels. The money us, the world tax payers, fork out in subsidizing the sales of fossil fuels and agrochemicals is insane.  It just  guarantees that climates will get progressively worse for centuries, and we're paying for it .  


Carbon Still – Testing for Humus

YEOMANS CARBON STILL          using Loss On Ignition (LOI)  *Big 2,000 grams sample size *Dries sample in 30 minutes to 100°C *LOI Temperatures - 350°C to 550°C *Complete LOI in 60 to 90 minutes *Integral weighing in-situ at 100°C  *Accuracy  1/1000  *No laboratory needed. Farm shed OK With accurate infield sampling kit. Electric Powered Sling Mounted 4 inch auger.  Sampling sieves. 


Adopting the Yeomans Methodology

If you're a farmer, and farming is your living would you be happy to give building soil humus for Carbon Credits a go on your farm while complying with this methodology? I've tried to make it as workable as possible. If you can, or might, issue carbon credits and you're either government or private,  are the cross checks and securities built into this Yeomans Methodology workable for you?      


Energy Systems and Nuclear

It’s easy, practical and economical to switch to biofuels for transport and it’s easy, practical and economical to switch to nuclear energy for industrial power. We must remind ourselves that so called “sustainable” energy or “renewable” energy are only sustainable and renewable because they’re nuclear based.  


How bad can it Get?

If you're just voting age or younger - the reality is that if we don't remove the atmosphere's excess CO2 now, you will have a horrible and short life.


Fossil Fuels & Agrochemicals use fake News

Fossil fuels and agrochemicals are the prime causes of Global Warming. It’s logical to appreciate that Global warming cannot end if those organisations continue to exist. Those organisations know that. So, they use fake news, political lobbying and perception management to confuse the issue.


Crusaders & Volunteers – Together: how we can make ending Climate Change become a reality

The fossil fuel-agrochemical complex understands that to keep selling their products in an overheating world is a marketing exercise. I believe this is the only way we can save our biosphere and, maybe, beat them at their own game.


Home Page & how to navigate around this site

 This is primarily a Global Warming information web site. It presumes the majority of thinking people on Earth want global warming to cease and for the composition, and thus the optics of the atmosphere to be returned to their pre-industrial normal. This web site spells out how we can get the carbon dioxide overload out of the air, and how we then keep it out.


Welcome- this is our Home Page. At the start is shows you how to best navigate around this site.

This is primarily a Global Warming information web site. It presumes the majority of thinking people on Earth want global warming to cease and for the composition, and thus the optics of the atmosphere to be returned to their pre-industrial normals. This web site spells out how we get the carbon dioxide overload out of the air, and how we then we keep it out.

3. LINK TO YEOMANS PLOW WEB SITE 4. Born After 1985 “The world is your oyster” “not bloody likely?” 5. Stopping Global Warming Tactics 6. Funding to stop Climate Change 7. Carbon Still – Testing for Humus 8. Adopting the Yeomans Methodology 9. Energy Systems and Nuclear
2. Link To Video/Photo Gallery 1. Who Is Allan Yeomans? 13. Home Page & how to navigate around this site

"The urgent problem is getting rid of the excess carbon dioxide that's already there. Soil can do that.

Emissions reductions must become zero, but that can be phased in over the next two to three decades."
Allan Yeomans. January 1998

Yeomans LOI Soil "Carbon Still"© test takes two hours. Accepts huge 2,000 gram test sample. 550°C

Plus - Yeomans Soil Test Protocol
(for info click Button 1)

10. How bad can it Get? 11. Fossil Fuels & Agrochemicals use fake News 12. Crusaders & Volunteers – Together: how we can make ending Climate Change become a reality

How to navigate around this Yeomans Concepts site

First: You place the Cursor over one of the thirteen numbered buttons, and leave it there. Second: The button will turn yellow and the big square on the left side lights up a summary of what’s on that web page. Don’t move cursor Third: Left Click and you have opened the whole page, move cursor off site . Scroll down for the information you’re chasing. Then do what you want with the cursor Forth:Then scroll, up or down, to find what you want. Fifth: Want to go back up to the top of the page? Put the Cursor on the White House. It’s always in the top right hand corner of the screen. And click it.

“I believe this is how we can really end global warming. But time is short and irreversibility is frighteningly close”
Allan Yeomans

First- We must take the one trillion tonnes excess carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. Only farms and farmers can do it for us simply by creating more humus in their soils. It’s what organic farmers do all the time. It’s now being called “soil carbon sequestration”. Don’t shackle our farmers, just pay them $10 a tonne minimum, and no strings attached,  and they will figure out the cheapest and best systems for their own farm themselves. It becomes an absolute win – win for all of us..

It’s know acknowledge by meteorologists and oceanographers that — “You can’t stop the creeping heating if you leave the stuff there”


Second- We must not let it ever build up again. So we must massively increase the use of  NON-FOSSIL fuels. We switch to direct nuclear power generation for 24/7 industrial power. This can be assisted by indirect nuclear power such as solar, wind, geothermal, and hydro. For transport we make the tiny engine changes needed to run on bio-fuels and adapt the design of city vehicles to operate on battery/electric power systems.

Shipping, because of size variations, will have to adapt as suits. With the these systems in place we can afford to keep air transport running on fossil fuels for much longer. It is only responsible for about 3% of current world greenhouse gas generation from fossil carbon .  It is, however s not a big change to design their gas turbines to run on biodiesel .   

I said back in the 1990s : “Renewable energy is all nuclear anyway ,for the Sun is a screaming fusion reactor and the Earth is a gently bubbling fission reactor and that’s right now”.  

All the “Renewable and sustainable” energy systems only exist because they run on nuclear power.  The only exception is tidal power because that energy comes from the gentle slowing down of the moon. That energy effect is generally too hard and too dilute to harvest.     Third-   Recognize that they don’t intend to go out of business. ” No way” says the countries and companies that mine fossilized carbon materials. And also “No way” says the countries and companies that process and market those materials, and of those, agrochemicals are way up at the top of the list. Their available war chest is around $1,000,000,000 a week, without even trying. That’s a billion dollars a week. ( It’s actually closer to one and a half billion.) How so? Well it’s simple. Anything from 1% of a business’s total sales, and up to 60% for some cosmetic lines, is spent on advertising and public relations and image building. (“Image building” now described as “perception management”.) Now check the total world sales of these climate changing products, and do the sums. Allowing just 1% to manage our “personal opinions” their add’ agencies would have their $1 billion a week in a heart bit. And it’s all used to “sell” us the image of their utterly fictitious innocence.      If we don’t try, then we are the fools. Pay our farmers, at least, $10 a tonne CO2, no strings attached,  and they’ll do it.
Doubters? So what? If It’s argued that creating humus, that’s creating soil carbon doesn’t work, then it follows that farmers will receive nothing and the costs will be zero. But not to give our farmers an unfettered, unrestrained and unencumbered opportunity to see what they can do would be beyond stupidity. For humanity has no known, no viable, no sane, and not even any hypothetical procedure for removing the atmosphere’s carbon dioxide overload. We have to try. It’s a very intelligent gamble. The Measure of Any Individual Countries Obligations is Clear There are international statistics on how much coal, oil and gas a country has burnt over the last few decades. So we know the world’s totals. So we know a country’s percentage contribution to the atmosphere’s CO2 overload. At 400 ppm the atmosphere’s total carbon dioxide overload is one trillion tonnes. The 1950 to 2000 figures show the percentage statistics for fossil fuel consumed per country. We have, for example, Australia at 1.17%; the US at 27.1%, the EU at 26.6%, Canada at 2.2% and Cambodia at 0.002%. At $10 a tonne Australia has to pay its farmers 1.17% of $10 trillion for totally removing Australia’s past contribution to Global Warming, that’s $117 billion. The US will pay its farmers a total of $2.7 trillion. It has already been estimated that the costs of climate change in the US will have climbed to $1.9 trillion per year by 2100. That’s under a year and a half to get to the, otherwise $2.7 trillion total. I believe it could take up to 15 years to get all that excess out of the air. So we are talking an annual cost for Australia of $8 billion: and for the US around $180 billion per year. A recent international report shows that Australia is “still subsidizing fossil fuel production to the tune of a massive $A5.6 billion a year”. Direct those subsidies to farmers for soil carbon sequestration and we are more than half way towards removing Australia’s obligation to ending global warming. And Australia ends up with some very rich and productive soils. Governments around the world are handing out close to $1 trillion per year in subsidies to fossil fuel producers and users. To see what’s happening, as a start, go to fossil fuel subsidies, . Or just Google “fossil fuel subsidies”. Redirect that $1 trillion to the individual country’s farmers and global warming will stop and temperatures will start to slowly normalize.